
Monday, June 28, 2010
BP 38 Wk4 The Art of Possibility -Chapters 10-12

BP 37 Wk4-2 DB Quickies:My Dream Teaching/presentation Environment

"What stands in between you and your dream job? Why do you deserve to work in a dream job environment? what do you bring to the table? Be specific." This is a great question as well in that it encourages us to think to the next stages after completing this degree. I know I came into this program with the idea of equipping myself to move out of the classroom and into a role of leadership with curriculum/people development. Now let me explain THAT! The Wordle picture above is a collage of self-descriptors of who I am, evolving into sprinkled with words from two appropriate quotes I love: "Above all, remember your humanity." -Sir Joesph Rotblat and "Above all things get wisdom and understanding."- The Bible
BP 36 Wk4-1 DB Quickies:My Dream Teaching/presentation Environment
.jpg)
Thursday, June 24, 2010
BP 35 Wk3 Discussion Deeper: Video Use in Education
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00stlqg/Science_Cafe_20_06_2010/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/scia/
http://dsc.discovery.com/games/games-tab-04.html
http://streaming.discoveryeducation.com/?location=klrn - register for your own login- sorry, can’t give you mine!
http://teacher.scholastic.com/products/instructor/Mar05_websitings.htm
go to these once inside the scholastic site:
The Yuckiest
http://yucky.kids.discovery.com (middle school boys love this one)
Digital Froggie
http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/go/frog
A Sickening Site
www.amnh.org/nationalcenter/infection
The Mysteries of Poo (middle schoolers love this one!)
www.kidwings.com
I too, use Edutopia but for different subject matter. However, I really like the sites you have suggested and the uses as well. This will be really helpful in the effective education area of our curriculum (this is the first school where it is truly apart of the curriculum). This is something that is needed. I am going to check out the larc.sdsu.edu/social media one for information on webinars as my students are really interested in the idea.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
BP 34 Wk3 Reading: Art of Possibility, Chapters 7- 9
Chapter 9. Lighting a Spark. It’s not about us. It’s about them. What are you doing to pay-forward from your universe of possibility?
My paying forward is simple: lead my example and make room for you to develop and create opportunities and pathways for kids to demonstrate and develop their own methods and ideas about how teach or utilize the information shared. I like to always learn new things- information, methodology and the likes, not just from adults but from spending time with kids to find out who they really are, how they think and what interest them as learners. Then take some of those ideas to develop lessons that work for them and cover the material that is suggested by the standards. This also allows for students to take some responsibility for their own learning and develop some leadership skills all why becoming invested in the lesson(s) at hand.
BP 33 Wk3-2 DB Quickies: Difficulties starting new programs/breaking the norm
Transformation is a universal constant that affects our lives from the moment we are born until we leave earthly existence behind. At the root of all growth, we find change. Sometimes the change and the circumstances leading up to it can cause joy but more often provoke feelings of discomfort, fear, or pain. In the case of situations where we are not in supreme control (no position of authority or admin.) change is unavoidable and we feel we are at the mercy of the whims of the powers that be.
Ok, now that I have shared a the Zen philosophy of embracing change, here is the meat if it:
Teachers resist change:
-for fear of looking bad, feeling bad, negative reviews
-lack of preparation or training time
-lack of support from administrators, colleagues and parents/students
-limited resources
-burnout
-lack of vision, investment or belief in the philosophy of the school and it’s direction
-individualistic mentality and plain ole’ stubbornness- selfish outlook.
Other successful organizations deal with technological changes by choosing a program that will help take their organization forward with the least amount of costs, introduce the changes and the benefits for the company as a whole and for the individual departments, give a timeline from implementation to benefits, prepare and train individual departments separately and have support in place to guide them through initial stages of change.
"Why are educators resistant to change, especially when it comes to technology? How do other institutions deal with technological change?
Christina Carboni:Teachers are resistant to change because:
• It is really nice in their comfort zone.
• Time is a commodity one does not have extra of.
• Intimidation.
• Afraid of being embarrassed that their tech skills are subpar.
• Fear of the unknown.
• Implementation is not taken seriously or enforced.
• Administrators do not make it a priority.
• It is not part of their yearly evaluation.
• There is no immediate monetary or personal gain.
• Training usually occurs on your own time and many times, paid for by you.
• Equipment is not readily available, accessible or they lack proper training on it.
• No regular support for troubleshooting problems.
• Slow servers and bandwidth issues.
• Access to Internet is limited and/or sites blocked.
• Constantly having to fight for technological freedom that they just give up and don’t bother anymore.
• Tenure
• With so many other things on a teacher’s plate these days, they just get so burnt out that to think about spending time having to learn new technology or anything else for that matter, simply puts them over the edge.
Other Institutions deal with technological change by:
• Offering incentives like raises or promotions.
• Mandate attending training.
• Offers financial assistance for tech education.
• The top of the line technology is usually available for efficient and effective businesses.
• Training is part of the workday and state of the art.
• Support staff for tech is usually part of the workforce team.
• Tech issues are handled within the company in a timely manner.
• Technological change is built into the budget.
• Part of their culture.
• Grow or stay in a dead end job.
• You need to keep up otherwise the technology will over run you, and your learning curve will be so great that you will not be able to catch up any longer.
• They deal with change very well!
My Comment to Christina: Christina, you make a lot of great points here and I think you have covered them all. I think that if teachers and educational systems adopted the philosophy of other institutions and made training mandatory, they would first need to make sure that they cared out time in the workday or week to accommodate the teacher so that it would eliminate the stress of feeling overwhelmed. Even a monetary incentive when your days and weeks are full are not enough.
BP 32 Wk3-1 DB Quickies: Difficulties starting new programs/breaking the norm
Briefly share any experiences you’ve had when you’ve had a part in introducing a new program or a new way to do things at your job site. Please share any triumphs or frustrations you’ve had trying to improve the system or when you’ve pioneered or piloted some outside the norm.
Five years ago I was apart of the conversion group known as the “Science GPS Dream Team”. This was a conglomerate made up of K-12 science teachers from throughout the county. The teachers were volunteers who were also recommended by their school administrators. Our task was to take the GPS (Georgia Professional Standards), unpack, review, revise and organize them in the best way possible to meet the needs of the state, county and most importantly our children’s needs. We started meeting for a week in the summer to break into groups by grade level and review the standards so that we could come up with a plan of action. With a great leader at the helm, we started on an exciting adventure. There was a lot of positive energy and knowledge shared. We again before school started and monthly during school to continue the process. When all was done, we each took the standards back to our respective schools and began training our departments on them, as was the role of the Science Contact. This is when the fight started! The acceptance at each school was varied. Lots of veteran teachers were not happy with being ‘told’ how to teach and what to teach. Other teachers were happy to see a standard way of teaching with a format that everyone was using. The problem was that even though it was a state and county mandate that we start using the unpacked standards, all administrators were supportive or cared enough to make the time or ensure that all science faculty attended training and carried out the recommendations in their classrooms. This caused a lot of friction between the faculty, added stress and increased frustration. A lot of teachers felt it was one more thing they had to do and others embraced the change. I addressed the challenges at my school by meeting with the administrators and getting support ( my vice principal was a former science teacher and great support), then developing a training program that worked for our school and addressed the concerns and challenges that our science faculty expressed (technology challenges, lack of time and understanding of curriculum, inexperience with more hands on lessons, etc) by creating folders for each grade level, training once person per level individually so they could help me train and support the others. All and all we had more buy in than resistance. That cannot be said for other schools as I learned when I transferred to a new school this year. Teachers were referring to the standards but no all were adhering to the guidelines.
Two summers ago, I took part in Social Justice Training. I would say that basically it is an anti-racism training, but that really do
esn’t do it justice. My training was a very intense 2 day overnight training. I was not paid to go, but was asked and accepted. The theory is that those staff members who have been trained will “mentor” other staff members, and try to encourage others to attend the 2 day training.
This past year, my principal brought in a group of teachers from a different district to facilitate a day of “Social Justice” with the thought that the two of us who had already been trained would be a part of the day.
It really didn’t go as expected. Instead of getting staff members fired up about the training and program, it did just the opposite. Even though we tried to explain to the trainers from the other district that we were the only people who had been through the actual training, they assumed that everyone had, and proceeded to insult and infuriate the rest of the staff. I spent the day trying to do damage control. I was really not very successful.
Comment: @Kim,
I know of the Social Justice Training to some extent as I have a friend who has facilitated and participated in them. Even though he was a trainer, he too, thought that the training was not as effective as it could have been. It is so unfortunate that the trainers were not open to listen and show that they were proficient in social justice, rather than forge ahead just to complete an agenda. Talk about being an oxymoron.